G. Sobota. Salem International University.

Adher- Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation order cipro 1000 mg on-line bacterial resistance, Occupational Therapy Ser- 4 ence to the interventions was limited in both groups cheap 750mg cipro fast delivery virus in us. However generic 500mg cipro free shipping antibiotic eye ointment, the percentage of obese patients with sarco- ment” programs are feasible and will be associated with beneft if penia has increased buy cipro 250mg online antibiotics for dogs cause diarrhea. This study aimed to investigate the effect of adequate levels of adherence are achieved. Mate- rial and Methods: A total of 62 patients were randomly assigned 52 to either an experimental group (n=32) or control group (n=30). Results: A statistically signifcant improvement of Specialties and Dentistry, Napoli, Italy, 2Second University of Na- all measures was observed in both the experimental and control ples, Physical and Mental Health and Preventive Medicine, Napoli, groups after intervention (all p<0. However, the experimen- Italy tal group exhibited a signifcantly superior improvement compared with the control group (p<0. Conclusion: Elastic-band resist- Introduction/Background: Osteoporosis is a chronic condition char- ance exercise exerted a signifcant benefcial effect on the physical acterized by loss of bone density and deterioration of bone strength function in elder female with sarcopenic obesity. Fall is generally should include a control group that does not receive any interven- the main cause of fractures. Hip fractures are the most common tion, and should follow the patients up for longer than we did. The objective of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and circumstances of the falls in patients with hip fractures. Iolascon1 lowing data: age, gender, fracture site, number of falls in the last 12 months and the year before the fall, characteristics of the fall 1Second University of Naples, Department of Medical and Surgi- that led to the fracture, including extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors. The majority Introduction/Background: The market of dietary supplements fell on their side (54%) but there were a signifcant percentage of and nutraceuticals is growing worldwide, in particular aimed to patients (>40%) who fell with other injury mechanisms. Our fndings support the to reduce muscle mass and physical performance in these subjects. PubMed Search Builder the terms: “bone”, “skeletal muscle” and 1 5 6 “central nervous system”/“brain”/“cognitive function”; we selected Tsan-Hon , , 1 the effective micronutrients; we identifed the effective and safe Shuang Ho Hospital-Taipei Medical University, Department of dosage regimens. Results: After an evaluation of scientifc publica- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei, Taiwan, 2National tions in medical literature in the last 10 years, with an evidence- Taiwan University, School and Graduate Institute of Physical Ther- based approach, we selected 12 positive relevant studies (1 system- apy- College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, 3Shuang Ho Hospital, atic review, 7 randomized controlled trials, 3 prospective cohort Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei, Tai- studies, and 1 international society guideline recommendations). Conclusion: Our scoping review showed that the 16 selected Introduction/Background: Sarcopenia is associated with loss of micronutrients in appropriate doses might have an ancillary role in muscle mass and also with an increased risk of physical disability musculoskeletal and cognitive functions in older people. Infec- Biglarian3 tion/abscess was more common in patients with >5 years disease 1University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ira- duration (p=0. Percentage of the neuromas in below knee nian Research Center on Aging, Tehran, Iran, 2Iran University of amputees was signifcantly higher than non-below knee amputees Medical Sciences, Department of Basic Sciences in Rehabilita- (45. Neuroma was found to be signifcant stump pathology in patients with below knee level amputation. Introduction/Background: Pain is a frequently undetected and un- dertreated health problem among nursing home residents which is not studied adequately. Kusumaningsih1 through cluster sampling method and their residents were invited to 1 Jakarta, Indonesia participate in the study. Results: The mean age of the participants cortisol circulating level with phantom limb phenomen was done in was 74. Pain signifcantly interfered with adults traumatic limb amputee without stump pain. Measurement general activity, mood, walking, normal work, relations with oth- was done twice, before and after. Based on the Cortisol serum level was examined using radioimmunoassay meth- results, factors such as age, gender and education were signifcantly od. A pilot study to validate of the score and the by appropriate training of health care personnel of nursing homes. Further studies on the effcacy show signifcance difference in the decrease of cortisol level within of management strategies of pain used in nursing homes may help six months in each group (p=0. Pearson correlation show signifcance negative correlation between decrease in cortisol level and increase in telescoping grade (r=– 0. Signifcant positive correlation between decrease in cortisol level and decrease in phantom pain intensity (r=0. Signifcance negative correlation between decrease in cortisol level and increase in referred phantom limb sensation (r=– 56 0. Within six months observation period, the changing pat- 1 1 1 1 tern of phantom limb phenomen in adult traumatic limb amputee or K. Material and Methods: A chart review was performed to identify demographic Introduction/Background: Ambulation forms an important part of and clinical data including the age (current and at the time of inju- rehabilitation program after lower limb amputations. Diabetes Mel- ry), disease duration, gender, reason for amputation, affected limb litus and its complications are commonly associated with below number, side and level of limb loss and ultrasonographic fndings J Rehabil Med Suppl 55 Oral Abstracts 21 knee amputation. Inspite of this, there is an absence of studies on 1The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Orthopae- the effect of diabetes on the post operative ambulation of an ampu- dics & Traumatology, Shatin, Hong Kong- China tee. This study analysed the role of diabetes as an independent fac- tor affecting post operative ambulation and compared it with non Introduction/Background: A cross-sectional study was carried out diabetics in below knee amputation. Material and Methods: In this to evaluate the use of prosthesis, mobility, and quality of life on 24 study a total of 105 below knee amputation patients were followed. Their bilitation programme having passed the 7th year after 2008 Sichuan post operative ambulatory level was compared by using Pinzur et Earthquake. Results: Adult tes Mellitus is an independent factor which has an adverse effect on amputees, comparing with young amputees, experienced worse the functional outcome of a patient after below knee amputation. Effects experiencing stump and phantom pain were also University of Hannover, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, greatly affected by age. Usage of prosthesis is also encouraged for Hannover, Germany better rehabilitation and mobility. Saraf 1Ludhiana, India itial studies done across two International centres showed the new instrument had reasonable inter-rater and intra-rater reliability with Introduction/Background: Below knee amputation is required in no ceiling or foor effect. Material and Methods: This was a ten the Wilcoxon signed rank test for signifcance to change. A total of 144 pa- Ranking the median scores confrmed that running, sports, walking tients were include of which 76 (53%) patients had Burgess closure long distances, squatting and kneeling were the most diffcult items, while 59 (41%) had skew fap closure. These groups were compared on the ing down, sitting, standing, bending and moving around outside the basis of stump healing time, rate of infection, time for prosthetic home/other were the easiest items with a median score of 0. Primary stump healing was 58% for skew faps and 55% at either end of the spectrum of diffculty. Of the total 144 patients, of the medians between 0 and 4 and the high number of individual 72. Burgess fap closure patients and 71% of Skew fap closure were happy with their prosthesis which was not signifcant. Conclusion: 60 Stump healing time, rate of infection, prosthetic ftting timing and prosthetic compliance was similar in both groups. She reported that the low back pain Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Shatin, became less. Conclu- Hong Kong- China sion: Since patients can preserve ability of independent gait after rotationplasty, rehabilitation team often did not involve in prescrip- Introduction/Background: The 2008 Sichuan Earthquake resulted tion when updating the prostheses. In this case, prescription of the in numerous severe injuries with long-term disabling effects, in- new prosthesis with team rehabilitation was effective for the patient cluding a large number of bilateral lower limb amputees. This cross- who had low back pain and gait problem after more than 20 years sectional study aims to evaluate the mobility, prosthesis use and following rotationplasty. Results: Patients with preservation of either one 1 2 Padang, Indonesia, M Djamil Hospital, Physical Medicine and or both knee joint(s), comparing with patients with no knee joint 3 Rehabilitation, Padang, Indonesia, Ministry of Health, Primary preservation, achieved higher mobility (p=0. Patients using prosthesis more than 50% wak- Health Care, Batu Sangkar, Indonesia ing time had better general adjustment (p=0. Patients exercising over 3 hours per week is aimed to help People with Disability (PwD) deal with Activity of achieved higher mobility (p=0. Conclusion: The results support the Material and Methods: One cadre is responsible for one PwD. A preservation of distal limb level and knee joint at surgical stage, book of manual will be provided for each caregiver of a PwD in ac- which is associated with fewer activity restriction, higher mobility cordance with what the PwD needs based on the matrix. The results also promote prosthesis use is made once in every six months by completing Form 2 during the and exercise during rehabilitation for better mobility and general period of 1012 to 2015. After evaluation 4 PwD (66%) 1University of Tsukuba Hospital, Department of Rehabilita- experience some improvements and 2 PwD (34%) shows no differ- tion Medicine, Tsukuba, Japan, 2University of Tsukuba Hospital, ence. The Center for Innovative Medicine and Engineering, Tsukuba, Japan, evaluation shows that 2 persons (66%) experience improvements, 3Kowagishi Laboratory, Department of Prosthesis and Orthosis, but 1 person (34%) indicates no difference. She had been repeatedly prescribed her prosthesis in a special hospital for prosthesis, however without involvement of Introduction/Background: Stroke is the third number of leading rehabilitation team. At the initial visit, her leg of the prosthetic side cause of death in Bangladesh and prevalence is 0. Ten participants people with disability (PwD) perform Activity Daily Living at selected by purposive sampling who have match inclusion criteria. Mate- analyzed using three stages: question analysis, content analysis and rial and Methods: Every Cadre handled one PwD and every PwD analysis of themes. Results: From the content analysis participants caregiver given a guidebook based on the matrix. The evaluation face some challenges: work stress, writing diffculty, working hour, is held every six months by flling form 2 from 2012 until 2015. The data collected until Dec about of extra facilities like: easy job given, fexible work load, support 26 PwD. Matsuba (hereinafter: PwD) with respect to the policies, actions, measur- 1 2 able targets, and the performance of the competent institutions and Yokohama, Japan, Yokohama Brain and Spine Center, Rehabilita- tion department, Yokohama, Japan, 3Tohoku University Graduate providers of vocational rehabilitation in achieving planned objec- tives. The analysis School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Reha- in 2013 focused on the entire concession period 2010–2013, which bilitation, Yokohama, Japan served as a pilot analysis.

For example discount 250mg cipro amex antimicrobial over the counter, say that we study the total errors made in estimating distance by the same people when using one or both eyes cheap cipro 250 mg mastercard antibiotic nomogram. We obtain these data: One Eye Two Eyes 10 2 12 4 9 6 8 Enter the data: In the Data Editor cipro 750mg on-line antibiotic vantin, create two variables best buy cipro antimicrobial quizlet, each the name of a condi- tion of the independent variable (for example, One and Two). Then in each row of the Data Editor, enter the two dependent scores from the same participant; for example, in row 1, enter 10 under One and 2 under Two. Select the variables: In the area under “Paired Variables,” drag and drop each of your variables into the highlighted row labeled “1. The output also includes the “Paired Samples Statistics” table, containing the X and sX in each condition. In the “Paired Samples Correlations” table is the Pearson r between the scores in the two conditions. We have these data: Condition 1: Condition 2: Condition 3: Blue Green Yellow 10 20 24 12 24 25 14 28 26 17 19 21 16 21 23 Enter the data: Enter the data as we did in the independent-samples t-test: Name one variable for the independent variable (for example, Color) and one for the depend- ent variable (Desire). Again identify a participant’s condition by entering the condi- tion’s number in the Color column (either a 1, 2, or 3). Label the output: Use words to label each level, as we did in the independent- samples t-test. Select Descriptive: Click Options and, in the “Options” box, checkmark Descrip- tive to get the X and sX of each level. In the “Descriptives” table, the first three rows give the X, sX and confidence interval for in each level. Under “(I) color” is first Blue, and in the rows here are the comparisons between Blue and the other conditions. Thus, the first row compares the mean of Blue to the mean of Green and the difference is 28. The confidence interval is for the difference between the s represented by these two level means. Under “(I) color” at Green are the comparisons involving the mean of Green, including again comparing it with Blue. Note in your output the line graph of the means, which may be exported to a report you are writing. Name the variables: In the Data Editor, name three variables: one for factor A (Volume), one for factor B (Gender), and one for the dependent variable (Persuasion). Let’s use 1, 2, and 3 for soft, medium, and loud, and 1 and 2 for male and female, respectively. Label the output: Enter word labels for each factor as described in the independent- samples t-test (B. In the Data Editor, enter a participant’s level of A in the Volume column and, in the same row, enter that participant’s level of B in the Gender column. While still in the same row, enter that participant’s dependent score in the Persuasion column. Thus, in the male-soft cell is the score of 9, so we enter 1 under Volume, 1 under Gender, and 9 under Persuasion. In row 4 of the Data Editor, for the first male-medium score, enter 2 under Volume, 1 under Gender, and 8 under Persuasion, and so on. Select the variables: Move your dependent variable (Persuasion) to “Dependent variable. Select Descriptives: Click Options and, in the box that appears, checkmark Descrip- tive Statistics. In the box that appears, to plot the main effect means, move a factor to “Horizontal Axis” and click Add. To plot the interaction, click the factor with the most levels (Volume) and move it to “Horizontal Axis. The row labeled “Total” has the X and sX for the main effect of soft volume, after collapsing across gender. In the next group of rows labeled “Medium” are the male-medium cell, the female-medium cell, and the main effect for medium volume, and so on. If the Gender factor had involved more than two levels, a separate “Mul- tiple Comparisons” table for it would appear. Likewise, compute effect size—using our formula for 2—for each significant effect. The One-Way Chi Square In Chapter 15, we discussed a study involving the frequency of left- or right-handed geniuses. Participant Handedness 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 11 1 12 2 Enter the data: In the Data Editor, name one variable (for example, Handedness). Select Chi Square: On the Menu Bar, select Analyze, Nonparametric Tests, and Chi- Square. Then type in the expected frequency for the lowest labeling score: We’d enter the fe for the number of 1s. For example, let’s examine the study comparing Type A or B personalities and the incidence of heart attacks from Chapter 15. Select the Chi Square: On the Menu Bar, select Analyze, Descriptive Statistics, and Crosstabs. In a survey, Foofy finds that three people prefer country music, nine prefer hip- hop, and two prefer classical. In another survey, Foofy asks if people like (1) or dislike (2) country music and if they like (1) or dislike (2) classical music. You can compute descriptive statistics for these raw interval/ratio scores by selecting Options and then checking Descriptive. The Mann–Whitney U Test Enter the data: Create the Data Editor as in the independent-samples t-test (B. Select the nonparametric test: On the Menu Bar, select Analyze, Nonparametric Tests, and 2 Independent Samples. Select the nonparametric test: On the Menu Bar, select Analyze, Nonparametric Tests, and 2 Related Samples. Select the variables: In the area under “Test Pairs,” drag and drop each of your vari- ables into the highlighted row labeled “1. You may use the smaller sum as Tobt as described in Chapter 15 and com- pare it to Tcrit. Or, in the output’s “Test Statistics” table, the smaller sum is transformed to a z-score. Select the nonparametric test: On the Menu Bar, select Analyze, Nonparametric Tests, and K Independent Samples. In the “Test Statistics” table, the Hobt is at “Chi-Square,” under which is the df. Then in each row, put the three scores from the same participant in the appropriate columns. Select the nonparametric test: On the Menu Bar, select Analyze, Nonparametric Tests, and K Related Samples. In the “Test Statistics” table, N is the number of participants, and at “Chi-Square” is the 2. Name the first Participants, the next for factor A (Dress), and the third for the dependent variable (Comfort). Thus, for participant 1: In the first row, enter 1, 1, and 4; in the next row, enter 1, 2, and 9; in the third row, enter 1, 3, and 1, and so on. Select the variables: Move your dependent variable (Comfort) to “Dependent Vari- able. We are interested in only the following: In the row labeled “Dress Hypothesis” is the Fobt for factor A (here, 3. Column C lists the proportion of the area beyond the z-score in the tail of the distribution. When N is greater than 30, transform rS to a z-score using the formula zobt 5 1rS211N 2 12. Two-Tailed Test One-Tailed Test –rcrit 0 +rcrit 0 +rcrit Alpha Level Alpha Level N N (no. Olds (1949), “The 5 Percent Significance Levels of Sums of Squares of Rank Differences and a Correction,” Annals of Math Statis- tics, 20, pp. Olds (1938), “Distribution of Sums of Squares of Rank Differences for Small Numbers of Individuals,” Annals of Math Statistics, 9, pp. To compare the means from an interaction, find the appropriate design (or number of cell means) in the table below and obtain the adjusted value of k. Values of Adjusted k Design of Number of Cell Adjusted Study Means in Study Value of k 2 3 2 4 3 2 3 3 6 5 2 3 4 8 6 3 3 3 9 7 3 3 4 12 8 4 3 4 16 10 4 3 5 20 12 Values of qk for 5. Winer, Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, McGraw-Hill, 1962; abridged from H. To conduct research and to understand the research of (c) We assume that the relationship found in a sample others reflects the relationship found in the population. It is the consistency with which one or close to one (b) If the number in the third decimal place is 5 or Y score is paired with each X. The independent variable is the overall variable the number in the second decimal place. Perform squaring and taking a square root first, then cific amounts or categories of the independent variable multiplication and division, and then addition and under which participants are tested. It is the “dot” placed on a graph when plotting a pair of reflect how nature operates. In each, as the scores on one variable change, the scores on the other variable change in a consistent fashion. A negatively skewed distribution has only one tail at the extreme low scores; a positively skewed distribution has restaurant quantitative discrete ordinal ratings only one tail at the extreme high scores. A speed quantitative continuous ratio frequency distribution shows the relationship where, as X scores change, their frequency (shown on Y) changes.

buy cipro 1000 mg on-line

Recognize that this correlation coefficient describes the relationship in our sample buy cipro visa virus jumping species. Ultimately we will want to describe the laws of nature cipro 1000mg lowest price antibiotic resistance mutation, inferring the correlation coeffi- cient we would expect to find if we could measure everyone in the population discount 750mg cipro free shipping antimicrobial yoga flooring. How- ever purchase cheap cipro line antibiotic quick guide, before we can do this, we must perform the appropriate inferential procedure (discussed in Chapter 11). Only if our sample correlation coefficient passes the infer- ential test will we then talk about how this relationship occurs in nature. The Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient describes the linear relationship between two vari- ables when measured by ranked scores. Or, if we want to correlate one ranked variable with one inter- val or ratio variable, we transform the interval or ratio scores into ranked scores (we might give the participant with the highest score a 1, the next highest score is ranked 2, and so on). Either way that we obtain the ranks, rS tells us the extent to which the ranks on one variable consistently match the ranks on the other variable to form a linear rela- tionship. If everyone’s rank on one variable is the opposite of his or her rank on the other variable, rS will equal 21. With only some degree of consistent pairing of the ranks, rS will be between 0 and ;1. Ranked scores often occur in behavioral research because a variable is difficult to measure quantitatively. Instead we must evaluate participants by asking observers to make subjective judgments that are then used to rank order the participants. For exam- ple, say that we ask two observers to judge how aggressively children behave while playing. Each observer assigns the rank of 1 to the most aggressive child, 2 to the sec- ond-most aggressive child, and so on. Because rS describes the consistency with which rankings match, one use of rS is to determine the extent to which the two observers’ rankings agree. Note: If you have any “tied ranks” (when two or more participants receive the same score on the same variable) you must first adjust them as described in the section “Resolving Tied Ranks” in Chapter 15. The computational formula for the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient is 61©D22 rS 5 1 2 2 N1N 2 12 The logic of the formula here is similar to that in the previous Pearson formula, ex- cept that rS accommodates the peculiarities of ranks (e. The D in the numerator stands for the difference between the two ranks in each X–Y pair, and N is the number of pairs of ranks. For the column labeled D, either subtract every X from its paired Y or, as shown, every Y from its X. Filling in the formula gives 61©D22 61182 rS 5 1 2 2 5 1 2 N1N 2 12 9181 2 12 In the numerator, 6 times 18 is 108. This tells us that a child receiving a particular rank from one observer tended to receive very close to the same rank from the other observer. Therefore, the data form a rather narrow scatterplot that tends to hug the regression line. To determine r for the following ranks, find the D of For the ranks: S each X–Y pair, and then D2 and N. One important mistake to avoid with all correlation coefficients is called the restriction of range problem. It occurs when we have data in which the range between the lowest and high- est scores on one or both variables is limited. This will produce a correlation coefficient that is smaller than it would be if the range were not restricted. A B We see a different batch of similar Y scores occurring as X increases, producing an elongated, relatively nar- row ellipse that clearly slants upwards. Therefore, the correlation coefficient will be relatively large, and we will correctly conclude that there is a strong linear relationship between these variables. However, say that instead we restricted the range of X when measuring the data, giving us only the scatter- plot located between the lines labeled A and B in Figure 7. Now, we are seeing virtually the same batch of Y scores as these few X scores increase. Therefore, the correlation coefficient from Scatterplot showing these data will be very close to 0, so we will conclude that there is a very weak—if restriction of range in any—linear relationship here. This would be wrong, however, because without us X scores restricting the range, we would have seen that nature actually produces a much stronger relationship. Generally, restriction of range occurs when researchers are too selective when obtaining participants. Thus, if you study the relationship between participants’ high school grades and their subsequent salaries, don’t restrict the range of grades by testing only honor students: Measure all students to get the entire range of grades. Or, if you’re correlating personality types with degree of emotional problems, don’t study only college students. People with severe emotional problems tend not to be in college, so you won’t have their scores. Likewise, any task you give participants should not be too easy (because then everyone scores in a narrow range of very high scores), nor should the task be too difficult (because then everyone obtains virtually the same low score). In all cases, the goal is to allow a wide range of scores to occur on both variables so that you have a complete descrip- tion of the relationship. Later we’ll also see other coeffi- cients that are designed for other types of scores, and you may find additional, ad- vanced coefficients in published research. However, all coefficients are interpreted in the same ways that we have discussed: the coefficient will have an absolute value between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating no relationship and 1 indicating a perfectly con- sistent relationship. In real research, however, a correlation coefficient near ;1 simply does not occur. Recall from Chapter 2 that individual differences and extraneous environmental vari- ables produce inconsistency in behaviors, which results in inconsistent relationships. Chapter Summary 155 Therefore, adjust your expectations: Most research produces coefficients with absolute values in the neighborhood of only. It is the one number that allows you to envision and summarize the important information in a scatterplot. For example, in our study on nerv- ousness and the amount of coffee consumed, say that I tell you that the r in the study equals. Also, you know that it is a rather consistent relationship so there are similar Y scores paired with an X, producing a narrow, elliptical scatterplot that hugs the regression line. And, you know that coffee consumption is a reasonably good predictor of nervousness so, given some- one’s coffee score, you’ll have considerable accuracy in predicting his or her nervousness score. Therefore, as you’ll see in later chapters, even when you conduct an experiment, always think “correlation co- efficient” to describe the strength and type of relationship you’ve observed. A scatterplot is a graph that shows the location of each pair of X–Y scores in the data. An outlier is a data point that lies outside of the general pattern in the scatterplot. The regression line summarizes a relationship by passing through the center of the scatterplot. In a linear relationship, as the X scores increase, the Y scores tend to change in only one direction. In a positive linear relationship, as the X scores increase, the Y scores tend to increase. In a negative linear relationship, as the X scores increase, the Y scores tend to decrease. In a nonlinear, or curvilinear, relationship, as the X scores increase, the Y scores do not only increase or only decrease. Circular or elliptical scatterplots that produce horizontal regression lines indicate no relationship. Scatterplots with regression lines sloping up as X increases indi- cate a positive linear relationship. Scatterplots with regression lines sloping down as X increases indicate a negative linear relationship. A correlation coefficient describes the type of relationship (the direction Y scores change) and the strength of the relationship (the extent to which one value of Y is consistently paired with one value of X). A smaller absolute value of the correlation coefficient indicates a weaker, less consistent relationship, with greater variability in Y scores at each X, greater vertical spread in the scatterplot, and less accuracy in predicting Y scores based on correlated scores. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) describes the type (either positive or nega- tive) and the strength of the linear relationship between two interval and/or ratio variables. The Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient (rS) describes the type and strength of the linear relationship between two ordinal variables. The restriction of range problem occurs when the range of scores from one or both variables is limited. Then the correlation coefficient underestimates the strength of the relationship that would be found if the range were not restricted. Because a stronger relationship allows for greater accuracy in predicting Y scores, researchers say the X variable is a better predictor of Y scores, allowing us to ac- count for more variance in Y. What is the difference between an experiment and a correlational study in terms of how the researcher (a) collects the data? What are the two reasons why you can’t conclude you have demonstrated a causal relationship based on correlational research? What does a correlation coefficient equal to 0 indicate about the four characteris- tics in question 8? For each of the following, indicate whether it is a positive linear, negative linear, or nonlinear relationship: (a) Quality of performance 1Y2 increases with increased arousal 1X2 up to an optimal level; then quality of performance decreases with increased arousal. Poindexter sees the data in question 12d and concludes, “We should stop people from moving into bear country so that we can preserve our bear population. For each of the following, give the symbol for the correlation coefficient you should compute. He concludes that the time spent taking a test forms a stronger relationship with the number of errors than does the amount of study time.

Comparative efficacy of bronchoalveolar lavage and telescoping plugged catheter in the diagnosis of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients order cheap cipro antibiotics eye drops. Diagnostic tests for pneumonia in ventilated patients: prospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy using histology as a diagnostic gold standard cheap cipro 250 mg on-line antibiotic natural alternatives. Diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in cancer patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: a prospective comparison of the plugged telescoping catheter with the protected specimen brush cheap 250 mg cipro free shipping bacteria 5th grade. Impact of appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy on the outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia order cheap cipro line bacteria are prokaryotes. Risk factors for Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients. Risk factors for infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Experience with a clinical guideline for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia: comparison of episodes due to piperacillin-resistant versus piperacillin-susceptible organisms. The safety of targeted antibiotic therapy for ventilator- associated pneumonia: a multicenter observational study. Pneumonia in the surgical intensive care unit: factors determining successful outcome. Area under the inhibitory curve and a pneumonia scoring system for predicting outcomes of vancomycin therapy for respiratory infections by Staphylococcus aureus. High-dose vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity. Slow response to vancomycin or vancomycin plus rifampin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Analysis of vancomycin entry into pulmonary lining fluid by bronchoalveolar lavage in critically ill patients. Linezolid vs vancomycin: analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia. Clinical cure and survival in Gram-positive ventilator- associated pneumonia: retrospective analysis of two double-blind studies comparing linezolid with vancomycin. Recent advances in the treatment of infections due to resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Tigecycline outcomes for infections due to multi-drug resistant Gram-negative organisms. Tigecycline usage in cancer patients with serious infections: a report on 110 cases from a single institution. Recurrent Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in ventilated patients: relapse or reinfection? Antibiotic therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: outcome correlations in a prospective study of 200 patients. Treatment of severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem-cilastatin. Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem monotherapy with imipenem plus netilmicin for treatment of severe infections in nonneutropenic patients. Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam- aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and tracheobronchitis caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa with aerosolized colistin. Comparison of ampicillin-sulbactam and imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of acinetobacter ventilator-associated pneumonia. Pneumonia caused by oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treated with glycopeptides. Aerosolized antibiotics in mechanically ventilated patients: delivery and response. Does combination antimicrobial therapy reduce mortality in Gram-negative bacteraemia? Randomized trial of combination versus monotherapy for the empiric treatment of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic therapy for ventilator- associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized trial. Causes and predictors of nonresponse to treatment of intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia. The challenge of anticipating catheter tip colonization in major heart surgery patients in the intensive care unit: Are surface cultures useful? Cunha Infectious Disease Division, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, New York, and State University of New York School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, U. If isolate is meropenem-resistant, change therapy to tigecycline or ceftriaxone plus linezolid. Vancomycin serum levels are unhelpful in avoiding nephrotoxicity or optimizing therapeutic outcomes (44–56). Diagnostic features l Bacteremia of intermittent and of variable duration/intensity (1/4, 1/2, 2/4) l Temperatures usually 1028F B. Clinical Approach to Therapeutic Failure Therapeutic failure manifested by fever or bacteremia that persists after a week of appropriate therapy should prompt the clinician to reevaluate causes of antibiotic-related therapy. Also, Intravenous Central Line Infections in Critical Care 215 the nonantibiotic causes of apparent antibiotic failure should also be considered, i. If persistent fever is related to a myocardial/paravalvular abscess, or device related, then surgical drainage/valve replacement may be needed to control/eradicate the infection (62–68). Infections caused by intravascular devices used for infusion therapy: pathogenesis, prevention, and management. Nosocomial infections related to use of intravascular devices inserted for long term vascular access. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Increased infection rate in double lumen versus single lumen Hickman catheters in cancer patients. Colonization and bacteremia related to duration of triple- lumen intravascular catheter placement. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous- catheter-related infection. Long term outcome and quality of care patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with eradicable foci versus noneradicable foci. Importance of focus identification in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis: comparison of nosocomial and community-acquired infection. Risk factors for metastatic infection in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with and without endocarditis. Course and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteriemia: a retrospective analysis of 308 episodes in a Swiss tertiary-care centre. Incidence of endocarditis, risk factors for mortality, and clinical impact of methicillin resistance. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: clinical, serological and echocardiographic findings in patients with and without endocarditis. Endocarditis during Staphylococcus aureus septicemia in a population of non-drug addicts. Diagnosis and management of infections of implantable devices used for prolonged venous access. Optimal duration of therapy for catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a study of 55 cases and review. Cost-effectiveness of transesophageal echocardiography to determine the duration of therapy for intravascular catheter-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Prospective study of 114 consecutive episodes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. The use of antibiotics: a clinical review of antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral drugs. In vitro killing of community-associated methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus with drug combinations. Efficacies of vancomycin, arbekacin, and gentamicin alone or in combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro infective endocarditis model. Slow response to vancomycin or vancomycin plus rifampin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Serum bactericial acitivity of rifampin in combination with other antimicrobial agents against Staphylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: recurrence and the impact of antibiotic treatment in a prospective multicenter study. Cell wall thickening is a common feature of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. The influence of antibiotic use on the occurrence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Routine monitoring of serum vancomycin concentrations: waiting for proof of its value. Brusch Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.